Teachers need the commitment of the senior leadership team
and support of members of the languages department in order to
successfully introduce an NVQ course as there are some important
aspects to consider:
Planning the course
Step
1 Registering as a centre
Before beginning the course, it will be necessary to select an
awarding body (Edexcel and OCR both offer NVQ Languages) and to
register as a centre to deliver
NVQ.
Step 2 Staffing the course and the personnel in the
assessment process
It is essential that the staff selected to teach the NVQ course
fully embrace the fact that the course is work-related and that
this will need a change of approach if the course is to be
successful. Teachers within a department can teach the NVQ course
as language experts, however if language teachers have not gained
the A1 assessor award, assessments carried out by them must be
countersigned by a fully qualified A1 assessor (For detailed
information about the requirements of the A1
assessor award and documents related to the award. This
information will assist teachers who are working towards the award
to understand each part of the evidence requirements for the
award.) To be cost effective this ideally needs to be
someone within the school or within a partnership system with
other schools. A trained assessor can assess their own students or
other students' portfolios.
For detailed information about the requirements of
the A1 assessor award and documents
related to the award. This information will assist
teachers who are working towards the award to understand each part
of the evidence requirements for the award.
Internal Verification
An Internal Verifier (who holds a D34 or V1 award) is responsible
for the quality assurance of the assessment process within the
centre. As part of this, they will select portfolios to sample.
They will need to document this process. Have a look at examples of
IV
documentation and a further example in the case study from
Kingsmead School. The school or
college may have to buy in IV support until a member of staff is a
qualified internal verifier.
Overview of the Assessment Process
The chart below shows the roles of each person in the assessment
process.

Step 3 Planning Schemes of work
Time will need to be allocated to plan detailed schemes of work to
ensure that there is full coverage of the performance criteria,
range and knowledge. Some examples of schemes of work are in the
resources
section. It is wise for staff to attend a training
session on planning assessments to meet the National Language
Standards and/or to visit schools or colleges in the area who are
already teaching NVQ. Such links are very helpful and may be
essential until a school of college has its own qualified assessors
and internal verifiers. Go to the main alternative accreditation page for case studies
of some schools who are currently delivering NVQ language
courses.
Visits, links with companies/tourist attractions and trips
abroad should be planned in order to set the course in an authentic
work-related context. Contacting the local Education Business
Partnership may help with this. If you are unsure of local
contacts, consult the National
Education Business Partnership Network or your local Regional Languages Network.
Step 4 Timetabling
Timetable allocation for the NVQ course at levels 1 or 2 is the
same as for the conventional GCSE course. It is desirable for
some lessons to be timetabled in a computer room if possible in
order to enable students to wordprocess written tasks, carry out
internet research, produce PowerPoint presentations and webpages
for example. However most lessons should not need ICT access. A
typical model might be one lesson in every four or five taking
place in a computer suite or a short block of lessons (eg four or
five) to complete a particular project which might be internet
based.
Step 5 Plan time for standardisation, internal
verification and external verifier visits
You are advised to agree with senior management in advance of the
course time for standardisation, internal verification and external
verifier visits. The amount of time needed will depend upon the
number of candidates. More time will be needed at the
beginning of the course as staff familiarise themselves with the
requirements of the National Language Standards. Some suggested
timings are in the section below.
When the course is running
Assuming a course running over 6 terms with 60
candidates or less taught by one or two staff
|
Time in the course
|
Activity
|
|
End of term 1
|
Standardisation of a sample of student portfolios by staff
delivering the course. Countersignature needed by qualified
assessor. This process needs to be documented. Suggested sample
size one fifth of students (ie 12 students out of 60). Time
needed Half to one day.
One member of staff may be working towards the A1 assessor award at this time.
|
|
Middle of term 2
End of term 2
|
Further standardisation of different portfolios documented as
previously. Internal verifier visit. (Half to one day)
Member of staff continues work on A1 portfolio. Depending on
progress, the portfolio may be finished during term 2. It is wise
to ask for time to undertake work on this portfolio.
First external verifier visit. EV will want to see evidence of
internal verification, meet assessors and a small number of
candidates with their portfolios. (EV is not testing
candidates on their oral competence during this visit, but
discussing portfolio work in English). The EV will want to see
portfolios, evidence of speaking (tape, CD, digital files) and
tracking documentation signed by assessor. IV and candidate showing
progress through the National Language Standards. The EV will
produce a report which may have some action points. These
points will need to be disseminated to staff teaching the
course.
|
|
Towards the end of term 3.
|
Further standardisation, internal verification followed by final
EV visit of the first year. At the end of the first year, you may
want to claim some units for some candidates. The decision on which
candidates should be claiming units will be made by the Internal
Verifier and the EV will either agree or disagree with the
decision. Therefore, it will be necessary to provide.
By now, member of staff should have completed the A1 award.
|
|
Term 4
|
Standardisation of a sample of student portfolios by staff
delivering the course. Countersignature needed by qualified
assessor who may by now be in-house. This process needs to be
documented. Time needed half to one day.
Second A1 assessor may begin training if appropriate.
Qualified assessor may begin internal verifier training.
|
|
Term 5
|
Internal verification followed by EV visit. EV may want to
meet further candidates and assessors. Second member of staff
continues work on A1 portfolio. Trainee internal verifier works
with qualified IV and assessors to gather evidence for V1
portfolio. EV produces report again on the work. This will indicate
any final actions which need to take place before the final visit
in term 6.
|
|
Term 6
|
Final assembly of portfolios, final internal verification where
decisions are made on the work of each student. List should be
provided for the EV of all units hopefully being claimed, completed
portfolios and accompanying oral work and all assessment
documentation needs to be up to date for this final visit. If the
EV agrees with decisions made, candidates will then be signed off
and certificates will be claimed. In the case of disagreement,
candidates will have the opportunity to re-submit work. However,
issues such as this are normally picked up in earlier EV
visits.
Trainee IV may complete portfolio at this stage or perhaps be
carrying on the process in the next academic year.
|
Where there are greater numbers of candidates, more time will
need to be allocated to standardisation and internal
verification.
Hints and tips on organisation from existing NVQ
Centres
Funding
'Funding can also be problematic, particularly
for a small school, since although registration fees cover Levels
1-4 students would not normally progress beyond Level 2 by age 16.
Although the Centre Registration fee is a single payment this can
represent a considerable outlay for a small school and examiners'
visits are also more expensive for a small number of candidates.
However, advantages in terms of student motivation and the
experience of success in gaining a qualification recognised in the
workplace more than outweighs these disadvantages.
Class Size and individual attention for
students
'The NVQ is ideal for weaker students who will
achieve better results on a portfolio building course than in an
exam.
'Given that many of our NVQ students need considerable support, it
is essential to limit class size – 16 is ideal. I find many
students who may have been demotivated at the beginning of the
course become more motivated as they discover that the NVQ gives
them every opportunity to experience success.' Ceri Dunbar,
Hove Park School
'The NVQ tends to generate a lot of
paperwork and feedback sessions require frequent one-to-one
sessions with students.This approach fits very well with the
personalised learning agenda and sets students up to achieve
sometimes for the first time in their school career. Time
needs to be allowed for pupils to re-visit assessments and also for
those who have missed any through absence. This is particularly
relevant to teachers who are considering running the course with
larger groups, such as in Year 9.' Juliet Park,
Yewlands School
Planning Time Needed
'Before embarking on an NVQ course,
departments should ensure they are given sufficient time for
organisation and planning. There should also then be follow-up
sessions, perhaps initially on a termly basis and then annually, to
further develop the course and make adjustments and additions where
necessary. There also needs to be constant dialogue between
teachers and assessors throughout the course to ensure assessment
decisions are correct and to monitor how classes are progressing.
There is a lot of paperwork and so organisation both amongst
students and staff is vital.' The NVQ Team at Kingsmead
School
Support with speaking from foreign language
assistants
'NVQ classes at Warden Park are small (fewer
than 15 students) and given support from the FLA (to practise and
record Listening and Speaking tasks). Teaching assistants who have
some language knowledge are invaluable. This high adult:student
ratio has cost implications, so support from the leadership team is
essential. Many of our NVQ students have poor attendance and weak
study skills. We aim to record sufficient evidence in Speaking and
Listening early in Year 10. All work for NVQ is produced in the
classroom and students make positive comments about the lack of
homework and exams.' Jean Gittins, Warden Park School
No syllabus means creativity is possible
''There is no bespoke syllabus to follow for
NVQ which means you can be creative and basically teach what you
wish as long as you can relate it to the National Language
standards 2005, but this does mean a lot of preparation for the
teaching staff.' Andrew Starr, The Bourne Community
College
Need for qualified assessors and internal
verifiers
'In order to deliver an NVQ course, MFL
departments need access to at least one A1 trained assessor with
linguistic competency in the school. The training should take place
whilst delivering the NVQ so it is not necessary to pre-qualify.
VIPS offers A1 training as well as manuals in French, German and
Spanish for level one and two.' Juliet Park, Yewlands
School
Read a history of the
IBC (formerly VIPS) project.
Read the IBC case study.
Assessor training is also offered by Belfry Training
Ltd who have extensive expertise in the training of linguists
for A1 and V1 awards. Many of the schools featured in the case
studies have trained with this company.